Welcome to the Promenader for summer, 2017. This is traditionally one
of our “bigger” issues, since it contains articles and photos of
numerous things that happen in the spring.
In this issue:
One highlight of every spring is Rochester‘s annual dance festival,
Dance-O-Rama, and we have photos and features to prove it. We cover
the dancing, the basket raffle, the awards, and most important of all,
the graduates.
Other events of interest are also covered in this issue, including two
milestones at the Cloverleaf Squares: Prom Night and Class
Graduation. The Shamrock Squares celebrate the 90th birthday of
Shirley Dickerson. Doing their part to help alleviate the growing
caller shortage, the Village Squares introduced five new voices at
their Amateur Caller Night. The Copy Cats mark Troopon Donations of
nearly $123,000.
In this issue we also mark the changing of the guard, with new
officers at the Rochester Area Federation of Western Round and Square
Dance Clubs (RAF), announce availability of assistance (from Leon
Smith) in posting club schedules on the international website “Where‘s
the Dance,” and we repeat a valuable column on how to be a Good Angel.
In the Club News section you will find specific news and announcements
from each club in the Rochester area.
Be sure to check you club‘s listings (click the
blue “OUR CLUBS” button on the RAF Home Page) and let us
know if we‘ve missed anything! We try to keep up with changes in officers, but
we don’t always receive notification.
In Memoriam: In this issue we remember John Benesch, Debbie Bennett,
Gerry Thompson, Randy Muecki and Twila Leach.
Rochester Area Federation:
Before handing off to Jim Gotta, Warren Olson‘s final comments as
president of the RAF can be found by clicking the “President‘s Corner”
button on the Federation page. An article
introducing the new slate of RAF Officers is found in “Photos and
Features”.
Editorial Comments: Challenges in New Dancer Development
Last summer and fall we made a big push to welcome graduates into a
wide range of dances and other dance-related social events, in hopes
of increasing the chances that they would stay on the path to
becoming “dancers.” In three clubs that I know best (Copy
Cats, Cloverleafs and Belles ’N’ Beaus), the retention
rate has been at least 25 out of 45—i.e. almost 56
percent. And that‘s a conservative figure because I‘m
only counting people I know for sure are still dancing. That‘s
a lot better than the estimated 20% that has been considered the
norm, so kudos to clubs whose extra efforts paid off. (This year, the
number of graduates is down, so the importance of retention is even
higher.)
That‘s step one, and we need to continue those efforts with 2017 graduates. But
equally important is step two: helping graduates become dancers. As we
all know from our own experience, that takes a lot longer than any of
us envisioned when we started. Remember those first few years, feeling
like we were dragging down one square after another and we were afraid
to dance at unfamiliar clubs?
This is where experienced dancers make a huge difference. Dancing is a
social activity, and feelings of uncertainty about dancing translate
all too easily into feelings of rejection. So, it takes an extra
special amount of encouragement on the part of experienced dancers to
put new dancers at ease. They need to be able to focus on learning
without equating it with social pressures that get in the way. (And,
by the way, this happens at every level. It is not just new
graduates. We are all learning, and there are always better dancers in
our square.)
From what I‘ve seen over that past year, clubs have done amazingly
well at welcoming new dancers and fostering a comfort level that
promotes learning and retention. Part of this has been from personal welcoming attitudes
of experienced dancers, and part of it has come from
adjustments to the dance program—such as by reducing the number of unfamiliar
or unusual calls.
But I am coming around to see both of these as mixed
blessings. Here‘s why.
Let‘s start with the dance program. One way to adjust the program
toward new dancers at a “Plus Club” is to take out the more
challenging calls or position variants and stick with what most Plus
dancers are familiar with.
The positive side of that approach is that it reduces breakdowns and
keeps more people dancing more of the time. But on the negative side,
it risks leading strong dancers to think about where else they can go
to find lively dancing at their own level.
So, to keep experienced dancers engaged we need to be careful how we
adjust the program. One way to do this is to make a clear division,
either tip-by-tip or by dividing the evening into segments, to
separate “learning” from “dancing.”
During a learning tip (or time
period) experienced dancers will (to the best of their varying
abilities) pay attention to learners in their square and help to
minimize breakdowns and/or speed up recoveries.
But during at least some of the “dancing” tips it‘s reasonable for
experienced dancers to want to square up together to dance at a level
that requires all their attention to be focused on their own dancing,
and to be in a square that‘s not so likely to break down—or at
least one that recovers quickly when things get out of whack. (See the article on breakdowns elsewhere in this issue.)
In the “good old days” this was accomplished by “cliques”
or pre-arranged squares that excluded less experienced
dancers. This form of segregation caused feelings of social rejection
and led many potential dancers to drop out or look for a more
welcoming club—which gets us to the personal aspects I mentioned
earlier.
There‘s another way to look at the “segregation” problem. Most new dancers
recognize that part of their comfort level is the result of
more experienced dancers paying attention to them—reaching
for the correct hand, or gently steering them in the right direction
by a light touch or sometimes just a word at the right moment.
It takes effort for experienced dancers to help them through a tip.
In designated “Full Plus” tips or time periods, new
dancers can express their appreciation for this by holding back for a
tip or two—or perhaps only a square or two—in designated “Full Plus” tips or time periods, to allow
experienced dancers to square up together.
A criticism of this approach is that it might deprive learners of the
chance to dance in more challenging tips that would help them
progress. How are they supposed to learn if they are excluded from the
“hot hash” or the “real Plus” tips?
Maybe the answer to that is for learners to square up anyhow, but in
their own square—perhaps including willing volunteers with more
experience. It’s always a good feeling to get through a “Full Plus” tip
without a serious breakdown! And there are many experienced dancers who
will gladly square up with dancers of any ability in a Full Plus or a Hot
Hash tip. It’s all dancing, and the more we all dance the more comfortable
we all get.
As usual, these are just my thoughts.
If you have other ideas on how to keep everyone happy as new dancers develop their skills, I hope you will share them with your club leaders.
A rancher was minding his own business when an FBI agent came up up to
him and said, “We got a tip that you may be growing illegal drugs on
the premises. Do you mind if I take a look around?”
The old rancher replied, pointing to one of his fields, “That‘s fine,
but you shouldn‘t go over there.”
The FBI agent snapped at him, “I‘m am a federal agent! I can go
wherever I want!” With that he pulled out his badge and shoved it into
the ranchers face.
The rancher shrugged this off and continued with his daily
chores. About 15 minutes later he heard a loud scream from the field
he had pointed out earlier. The FBI agent was sprinting towards him
with a large bull on his heels.
The rancher rushed to the fence and yelled, “Your badge! Show your
badge to the bull!”